☰
monad
monad
Functions
create a String from this instance. Unless redefined, `a.as_string` will
create `"instance[T]"` where `T` is the dynamic type of `a`
create `"instance[T]"` where `T` is the dynamic type of `a`
Get the dynamic type of this instance. For value instances `x`, this is
equal to `type_of x`, but for `x` with a `ref` type `x.dynamic_type` gives
the actual runtime type, while `type_of x` results in the static
compile-time type.
There is no dynamic type of a type instance since this would result in an
endless hierarchy of types. So for Type values, dynamic_type is redefined
to just return Type.type.
equal to `type_of x`, but for `x` with a `ref` type `x.dynamic_type` gives
the actual runtime type, while `type_of x` results in the static
compile-time type.
There is no dynamic type of a type instance since this would result in an
endless hierarchy of types. So for Type values, dynamic_type is redefined
to just return Type.type.
monadic operator within the same monad
Apply f to elements of type A and re-wrap them in this monad.
Apply f to elements of type A and re-wrap them in this monad.
§(B type, MB type, f Unary (monad.infix >>=~.MB) monad.A):Any => monad.infix >>=~.MB [Abstract feature]
§(B
type
, MB type
, f Unary (monad.infix >>=~.MB) monad.A):
Any =>
monad.infix >>=~.MB [Abstract feature]
monadic operator to another monad
Apply f to elements of type A and wrap them in MB.
NYI: This is currently useless since a redefinition is not
allowed for features with generic arguments. Is there a way
we could allow this anyway?
Apply f to elements of type A and wrap them in MB.
NYI: This is currently useless since a redefinition is not
allowed for features with generic arguments. Is there a way
we could allow this anyway?
join operator
NYI: useless since redefinition currently not supported for
feature with generics.
NYI: useless since redefinition currently not supported for
feature with generics.
convenience prefix operator to create a string from a value.
This permits usage of `$` as a prefix operator in a similar way both
inside and outside of constant strings: $x and "$x" will produce the
same string.
This permits usage of `$` as a prefix operator in a similar way both
inside and outside of constant strings: $x and "$x" will produce the
same string.
Type Features
string representation of this type to be used for debugging.
result has the form "Type of '<name>'", but this might change in the future
result has the form "Type of '<name>'", but this might change in the future
There is no dynamic type of a type instance since this would result in an
endless hierarchy of types, so dynamic_type is redefined to just return
Type.type here.
endless hierarchy of types, so dynamic_type is redefined to just return
Type.type here.
Is this type assignable to a type parameter with constraint `T`?
The result of this is a compile-time constant that can be used to specialize
code for a particular type.
is_of_integer_type(n T : numeric) => T : integer
say (is_of_integer_type 1234) # true
say (is_of_integer_type 3.14) # false
it is most useful in conjunction preconditions or `if` statements as in
pair(a,b T) is
=>
or
val(n T) is
The result of this is a compile-time constant that can be used to specialize
code for a particular type.
is_of_integer_type(n T : numeric) => T : integer
say (is_of_integer_type 1234) # true
say (is_of_integer_type 3.14) # false
it is most useful in conjunction preconditions or `if` statements as in
pair(a,b T) is
=>
or
val(n T) is
name of this type, including type parameters, e.g. 'option (list i32)'.
return function
Get a type as a value.
This is a feature with the effect equivalent to Fuzion's `expr.type` call tail.
It is recommended to use `expr.type` and not `expr.type_value`.
`type_value` is here to show how this can be implemented and to illustrate the
difference to `dynamic_type`.
This is a feature with the effect equivalent to Fuzion's `expr.type` call tail.
It is recommended to use `expr.type` and not `expr.type_value`.
`type_value` is here to show how this can be implemented and to illustrate the
difference to `dynamic_type`.
A monad in X is just a monoid in the category of endofunctors of X, with
product × replaced by composition of endofunctors and unit set by the
identity endofunctor.
Don't be scared, in Java terms: A monad is a means to compose functions
applied to generic types.